Position limits: managing exposure across exchanges, OTC, and bilateral contracts
Whitepaper
Regulatory stakes are rising
Your traders operate across CME, ICE, Nodal, EEX, and cleared OTC platforms simultaneously. Your position limit monitoring typically does not. This gap creates a choice: constrain trading capacity through conservative buffers, or risk breaching limits that are invisible in real time. In just three months during 2024, the CFTC issued $2.8 million in fines for position limit violations. The common thread: firms failed to properly aggregate positions across exchanges. Real-time position limit monitoring and cross-venue aggregation are no longer operational enhancements; they are requirements for maintaining trading capacity and regulatory control.
Request whitepaper
This whitepaper examines why position limit monitoring fails in fragmented commodity markets, how recent CFTC enforcement actions reveal gaps in firm surveillance programs, and what infrastructure is required to aggregate exposure across exchanges, OTC platforms, and bilateral contracts in real time without sacrificing trading capacity.
Perspectives
Insights
- Whitepapers
Trades, orders, and physicals: the three data layers trade surveillance needs
- Blog
Post trade infrastructure in Asia is getting more expensive to maintain
- News